Productivity needs more than Capability in the age of AI: IOWL opens Calibre architecture and Calibre Credits to universities and employers

BELFAST, 29 September 2026. The Institute of One World Leadership (IOWL), through its Global Institute for Calibre and Integrity, is making its Calibre development architecture and routes to Calibre Credits™ available more widely to universities and employers, arguing that efforts to raise productivity must address not only what people know and can do, but the Calibre with which they exercise that Capability and Competency.

IOWL contends that productive performance also depends on the quality of human judgement governing how, why and for whose benefit knowledge, skills, technology and organisational capability are exercised.

The announcement comes days before IOWL participates in the 2026 Annual Conference of the OECD Global Forum on Productivity on 5–6 October in San José, Costa Rica. The conference theme is From Gaps to Growth: Unlocking Productivity Across the Economy.

A decade in development. A year in international dialogue. Now wider deployment.

IOWL's work around Calibre has developed over approximately 10–15 years. Its starting proposition is straightforward: increasing what people are capable of doing does not automatically determine how intelligently, responsibly or constructively those capabilities will be exercised.

IOWL distinguishes three connected dimensions. Capability concerns what a person knows or has the capacity to understand. Competency concerns what a person can demonstrably do. Calibre concerns how, why and for whose benefit that Capability and Competency are exercised.

Over the past year, that longer development journey has become increasingly visible through OECD stakeholder forums, IOWL Working Papers, UK parliamentary evidence and wider stakeholder exchange.

IOWL participated in the OECD Global Forum on the Future of Education and Skills in Bratislava in November 2025, where curriculum transformation in the era of AI, agency, attitudes and values formed part of the international discussion. In March 2026, IOWL participated in the OECD Global Anti-Corruption & Integrity Forum in Paris, where the OECD framed integrity as relevant not only to safeguards but also to performance, resilience, innovation and economic efficiency.

The forthcoming Global Forum on Productivity extends that sequence across three connected domains in which IOWL has been developing and testing its proposition: Education, Integrity and Productivity.

The hidden human factor in productivity

IOWL argues that conventional productivity efforts have understandably concentrated on investment, skills, qualifications, infrastructure, technology and organisational capability. All are important. The Institute's proposition is that they remain incomplete if the quality of human judgement governing their use is left largely implicit.

IOWL describes part of the resulting problem as the Drag–Flag–Lag–Drag effect. Productive performance is already experiencing drag before a deficiency is recognised and flagged. Policy, education and training systems then require time to design and implement a response, creating a lag before new skills, competencies and capabilities reach the people and organisations that need them. By that point, circumstances may already have changed and new sources of drag entered the system.

Concentrating principally on future Capability and Competency can therefore leave two problems unresolved. The existing population continues to operate during the lag, while greater Capability does not itself determine the Calibre with which that Capability will ultimately be exercised.

“We repeatedly identify a productivity problem, flag it, build capability to address it and then wait for that capability to work through the system. During the lag, the economy continues to experience drag. Even when the capability arrives, the question of how well it is exercised remains.”
Professor Noel Ferguson, Executive Director, IOWL

IOWL's response is deliberately both horizontal and longitudinal: developing Calibre among people already in education and employment, while establishing a continuing pathway through which future cohorts can develop and maintain it as their responsibilities, technologies and circumstances change.

From the financial crisis to artificial intelligence

IOWL traces part of the development of its Calibre proposition to lessons made particularly visible during the global financial crisis. It does not contend that a deficit of Calibre was the sole cause of the crisis. Its argument is that the period demonstrated how technically sophisticated individuals and institutions can possess considerable Capability and Competency while failures of judgement, stewardship, restraint and responsibility can still generate profound economic consequences.

The rapid diffusion of artificial intelligence makes the distinction still more consequential. AI can expand human and organisational Capability at exceptional speed, but IOWL argues that the resulting productivity opportunity will partly depend on whether people retain the judgement and personal agency required to question, interpret and responsibly apply what automated systems produce.

“AI is making Capability easier to access and, in many contexts, easier to demonstrate. That makes the human question more important, not less. Universities and employers need to consider what happens when people possess comparable qualifications, competencies and access to the same technologies. The distinction increasingly lies in the judgement, responsibility and Calibre with which those capabilities are exercised.”

“Education cannot simply prepare people to use increasingly powerful tools. It must also help them retain the personal agency to question those tools, exercise independent judgement and remain accountable for the decisions they make.”
Professor Michele Russell, Provost & Chief Academic Officer, IOWL

When Capability is crowded, Calibre creates the distance

The same distinction has implications for education, employment and career differentiation. As qualifications become widespread, professional competencies increasingly standardised and sophisticated AI tools accessible to more people, individuals may increasingly find themselves competing with others possessing broadly comparable Capability and Competency.

IOWL argues that Calibre can become a distinguishing human factor. Two graduates may hold comparable qualifications. Two professionals may possess comparable technical expertise. Two managers may have access to the same information and AI systems. Their judgement, reliability, responsibility, effect on others and the purposes for which they exercise those capabilities can nevertheless be markedly different.

From concept to development and recognition architecture

IOWL has spent the longer development period building an integrated architecture intended not merely to describe Calibre, but to develop, assess, evidence and sustain it.

At its centre is Positive Value Leadership™, supported by Reflective Transformation, assessed development pathways, Calibre Credits™, Statements of Professional Standing, the Passport of Probity™ and Perpetual Calibre Development™.

Calibre Credits™ are awarded through IOWL's Global Institute for Calibre and Integrity following eligible assessed development, providing evidence alongside conventional indicators of Capability and Competency.

For universities, the architecture can sit alongside existing academic programmes rather than replace them. Initial engagement can include Touchstone™ (STM001), IOWL's complimentary introduction to Calibre, before learners choose whether to progress through further development and assessed recognition.

For employers, the architecture can support development across recruitment, onboarding, professional development, progression and leadership responsibility.

UK productivity evidence

IOWL has also taken the proposition into the UK productivity debate. On 5 December 2025, the Institute submitted written evidence to the House of Commons Business and Trade Committee as part of its inquiry into priorities for 2026. Published by Parliament on 20 January 2026 as PRO0162, the submission described Calibre Credits as a proposed third pillar of human capital alongside Capability and Competency.

“The past year has not been the beginning of this work. It has been the manifestation of a much longer development journey. We have brought the proposition into conversations spanning future education, integrity and productivity, listened to other stakeholders, tested our thinking and contributed our perspective. The next step is wider practical deployment.”
Professor Noel Ferguson, Executive Director, IOWL

IOWL at the OECD Global Forum on Productivity

IOWL will participate in the 2026 Annual Conference of the OECD Global Forum on Productivity on 5–6 October. The Central Bank of Costa Rica and the OECD are hosting the conference, which brings together policymakers, academics and civil-society representatives around the theme From Gaps to Growth: Unlocking Productivity Across the Economy.

Participation in OECD forums does not imply OECD endorsement, validation or adoption of IOWL's frameworks or propositions.

Explore Calibre & Productivity >

Ends.